<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>Dear RLMM WG and Yamada-san,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>PHYWG recently gone through the ballot process as part of the PHY specification and some of the comments received as part of the RLMM profile Annex.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>One of the comment is to change the support for FCS type sentence. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>Currently the RLMM Annex as part of the PHY specification includes,</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>"The FCS Type field (in the PHR) shall be set to 0 (4-octet CRC). It can also use 2-octet CRC, in which case, the FCS Type field is set to 1.”</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>Proposed change,</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>"The FCS Type field (in the PHR) shall be set to 1 (2-octet CRC). Packets received with the FCS field set to 0 may be discarded.” </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Other editorial changes was proposed to change the sentence from, "This normative annex specifies PHY requirements for the Wi-SUN RLMM profile.”, to "This normative annex contains PHY requirements specific to the Wi-SUN RLMM profile.”</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>I would like to ask the group if the above resolution is acceptable as shown above. Please let me know of any comments or objections <font color="#ff0000">by 4th March 10PM JST</font>.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please let me know of any comments or questions.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>Kunal Shah</div>
<div>PHYWG Chair</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div id="MAC_OUTLOOK_SIGNATURE"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>